
It's an odd performance experience. The poet-performer is thoroughly exposed to the audience in an intimate café setting. No twitch, fumble, flicker of the eye, momentary lapse, or badly chosen word gets missed. This led to a situation where I, as a performer, felt that perhaps I put up more emotional shields than would have been the case on a normal stage. I made little eye contact, as this disturbed my concentration. I gave very little physical embodiment of the poetry, as the space was restricted.
The response was good, but two comments stay with me. One audience member congratulated me with the words "well acted", and a friend told me that a companion had thought me "arrogant".
Ah well. If this was my attempt at presenting myself, rather than a character in a play, there's some food for thought before I try it again.
5 comments:
You know I have always felt those P&J performances to be more nerve-wracking than any "real" theatre things, no role, full lights, argh! I am so sorry I didn't make it there to support you. I'm sure you were great, though, Fionna spoke very highly of the show.
Arrogant? Gosh ... It's amazing, sometimes, the range of responses you get. Actually that's what I enjoy most about P&J - tossing stuff out there to see what happens.
Indeed! And I was once told about my 'very Duchess' delivery of a poem. A valid point, because it was a subconscious shield of sorts, and one I realised I'd maybe been using too much in my early p&js, at least with poems.
So in the next two performances, I worked hard to remove it from that piece; and keep it out of subsequent ones. With success, I think.
And that, Runopupu, is the only way to beat it. The armchair poet-performer never presents himself any better. Unless he reads himself poetry in front of the mirror ;)
Your words much appreciated, guys.
Runopupu is *really* good. I have distinct nickname-inventing envy.
Post a Comment